mirror of
https://github.com/soconnor0919/eceg431.git
synced 2025-12-11 06:34:43 -05:00
19 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
19 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
What points were the most clear to you? (List up to 3)
|
||
|
||
- Fundamentals of logic gates (or, and, not) made sense.
|
||
- Explaining how a NAND gate can make up the three fundamentals made sense.
|
||
Grading comment:
|
||
What points were the muddiest and you'd like to talk more about? (List up to 3)
|
||
|
||
- The idea of how a multiplexer functions makes sense, but its building blocks were kinda fuzzy (required external research).
|
||
- Same with a demultiplexer, but I have a better understanding now.
|
||
Grading comment:
|
||
Reflect on what you read.
|
||
Give me a sense about what is connecting to existing knowledge
|
||
-OR-
|
||
Your "ah ha!" moments
|
||
-OR-
|
||
What is hanging off by itself, not connecting.
|
||
|
||
The concepts of chapter 1 felt relatively simple. I understood logic gates and truth tables because of my prior courses, namely discrete math. The snippets of HDL and API descriptions also made a lot of sense to me, as I work on more complex API structures and took CSCI 306 with assembly covered. The idea of this course is exciting- I’ve worked on every individual segment before, but never have I gone from the fundamentals to a complete product. There’s usually layers of abstraction in my projects- working with existing frameworks, or stopping at a level where I show proficiency for a class assignment.
|