add reading reflections

reflections/readings/6.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+What points were the most clear to you? (List up to 3)
+
+- Lots of hardcoding, but it’s okay here (software brain scared)
+- Symbolic references seem like a fun challenge. I’m sure I’m the only person to say this.
+- This is just translation- Instruction X equals value Y. Just a bit more complicated. Spec will help.
+Grading comment:
+What points were the muddiest and you'd like to talk more about? (List up to 3)
+
+- I don’t like hardcoding. Magic numbers are bad.
+- Are we going to end up optimizing later? Especially since this is a low-power CPU.
+Grading comment:
+Reflect on what you read.
+Give me a sense about what is connecting to existing knowledge
+-OR-
+Your "ah ha!" moments
+-OR-
+What is hanging off by itself, not connecting.
+
+I feel like I say this every time- but this is where it’s getting good. We have the system, we have the language, now let’s make the system recognize the language (kinda but not really, you get what I mean). Again calls back to CSCI 306, but we didn’t write our own assembler, just explored how it worked. RISC-V, although simple, isn’t as simple as this machine. I’m worried about my resistance to magic numbers and hardcoding, although that’ll be necessary here. I also am not so sure where to start. But that’s a later problem.